Courtesy of Emily Hacker
Wikipedia is considered a free encyclopedia site, containing articles on many different topics and interests for people to access.
Created in 2001, Jimmy Wales came up with the idea of making a publicly editable encyclopedia, but Larry Sanger came up with the idea of using a wiki, which offers users the ability to edit articles online.
Many students enjoy using Wikipedia to gather large amounts of helpful information. According to Live Science, Wikipedia has over 3,000,000 English language entries, simple to use and easy to access, stealing the preference of students of all ages.
“Wikipedia is really good for getting information about general aspects of various topics. I don’t trust it for details, but when doing research, the sources cited at the bottom can be a good place to start,” sophomore Zoë Jenkins said.
However, teachers constantly emphasize how crucial it is for students to not use Wikipedia and instead find trustworthy sources online. Arguments like this are not new and have been debated for several years now.
“If you need a deep dive to support an argument or an analysis or your own research, you need to go to the primary sources. Wikipedia is not that,” English teacher Trevor Tremaine said.
Due to Wikipedia’s ability to let users edit article information, many find this digital encyclopedia to be inaccurate and untrustworthy. The longest Wikipedia hoax was the creation of an article claiming the existence of a fake word, “Vivarem,” which, according to Wikipedia hoax page, lasted 12 years and nine months
It’s only natural to expect this, considering that people can edit whatever and however much they’d like. Regardless of this fact, several studies claim that
Wikipedia is actually a reliable and easy-to-go-to source, with plenty of information and most accurate information.
According to a study conducted by a group of German researchers who systematically analyzed pharmaceutical drug information on Wikipedia.
“Accuracy of pharmacological information was in the range between 99.6 and 100% in the five categories evaluated for the German language version of Wikipedia[…] Similar results were obtained with the English language version of Wikipedia,” the researchers wrote.
While the same study also shows that the completeness of these articles is anywhere ranging from sixty-eight percent to ninety-one percent, the data this research provides show that these articles, or at least the ones about drugs, are close to being completely accurate.
If this is the case, then should students be able to use Wikipedia for all their research and papers?
“Its an aggregation of knowledge of some professionals and some quacks. So you need to go into their sources, the footnotes and the citations of a Wikipedia article, and go to the real sources the peer reviewed academic sources,” Mr. Tremaine said.
“Without this academic rigor and additional research that has been proofread and further researched by the students themselves, arguments can lose ethos,” he said.
Wikipedia continues to expand and grow to this day. While students may not directly use it for school papers, many teens still use it for outside information many different topics, ranging from pop culture to how to care for their pets.